Skip to main content

Saving money



When I go shopping at my favorite clothing store and  purchase something fabulous on sale, I love to tell my husband how much money I saved him.  He usually rolls his eyes, not totally buying that he "made" money by my spending it.  He took this picture of me shopping while we were on vacation - he was bored.



I have seen that same skeptical eye roll from claims managers when discussing the savings they can reap by using case management on their files. So let me tell you how just this week Stacy Mathis, RN saved one of our customers $75,000 with only 8 hours of case management services.  

A file was referred with a date of MVA October 2013. The claimant was driving a work vehicle and was rear ended.  He reported no injury at the scene and continued working regular duty.  In June 2014 he filed a work injury claim citing back pain for several months stemming from the MVA.  Case management received the file July 2014.  Red flag #1, delayed reporting.  Stacy arranged for evaluation and treatment of his back, and then the claim grew - he said he had fallen "due to his back pain" and hurt his knee.  Red flag #2, incomplete reporting.  AND his orthopedic surgeon is recommending knee surgery, which he wanted covered under his claim.
So follow along...The claimant's physician had recommended surgical repair of an ACL tear and meniscal tear secondary to a fall, as the result of back pain, stemming from the MVA.  Are you keeping up? Now it's not unusual for a claimant's personal physician to be sympathetic and go along with the patient's line of reasoning.  But in workers compensation the law requires "objective findings," and his personal orthopedic choice did not provide any objective findings, but did relate the knee surgery to the MVA from last October. 
Stacy gathered medical records and coordinated an Independent Medical Evaluation with an orthopedic specialist in order to address causation.  It happened Monday of this week.  A thorough physical evaluation was completed, along x-ray views of the knee.  While there was evidence of trauma to the knee that would correlate with a fall, there were significant preexisting chronic arthritic changes as well.   The final opinion was that there were no objective findings that he could relate back to the original injury.  Furthermore, he could not recommend surgical intervention for any of the present findings.

Needless to say, the carrier was pleased with the opinion.  If the claimant wants to pursue surgery with his own orthopedist, he can certainly do so under his own health insurance.  No surgery is cheap these days, but ACL reconstruction is a very costly procedure.  The hefty price of an IME documented the claim and was well worth the expense - and the expense of utilizing Case Management is justified with real savings value. 

So I think Stacy should go shopping and tell her husband she saved $75,000 this week!



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Case Management GPS

W The next time I purchase a new vehicle there are several features I have on my wish list.  For as much as we case managers travel, Navigation is high on the priority scale to make life easier.  Under the pressure of arriving at a physician appointment on time, it's never a good feeling to take a wrong turn or get lost. There are times our role as a case manager is much like a navigator. Deana Scott, RN had that experience just yesterday while attending a physician visit.  After three years of treatment for a work injury, the physician had nothing further to offer, and there appeared to be issues of malingering and symptom magnification.  There was a point at which the physician actually had a look in his eye of being lost as  far as how to bring the treatment course to an end.  Confusion centered around  the injured worker's return to work goals.   It's at times like this, a Case Manager is able to maintain focus and much like a navigato...
1 comment
Read more

Crystal's Small Task Saves Big Bucks!

A very special customer to JMS requested a small task in obtaining an impairment rating from a physician. There seemed to be some communication issues, between the adjuster and the physician.  The file initially did not have any case management services to help guide the treatment. and at the end of the process nearing file closure, there was a very high impairment rating assigned by the treating physician. Crystal Gilbert, RN got to work! Performing a file review, she found discrepancies with the past surgical history of the injured worker.  The injured worker had failed to give an accurate  medical history.  We gathered and provided the treating physician with medical records showing a prior WC injury to the same extremity and prior surgery to the same extremity of injury. Crystal was able to get a face to face meeting with the physician - because she's just that awesome - and review the medical records and providing documentation of the prior impairment ratin...
1 comment
Read more

A Brilliant Mind

Visit Our Website                                                          Connect with me on LinkedIn It’s kind of an inside joke around our office that I’ve been called “brilliant” by a physician for my interpretation of a lumbar MRI.  This story happened several years ago when Stacy Mathis, RN working with me in training, and was my witness!  This physician is known for his eccentric personality, and he went all out to make me feel as though my critical thinking skills really were brilliant!  I was attending a clinic visit for MMI and PPI assignment of a shoulder and lumbar injury.  The shoulder had been complicated by a postoperative infection, and was now healed.  The lumbar injury had been diagnosed as a strain, although an MRI had been obtained to rule out a disc herniation.  I was expecting a high ra...
Post a Comment
Read more